Legal Opinion
CEMEX, S.A. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 7, 1992No. Court 90-10-00509PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RESTANI, Judge.
In Gray Portland Cement and Cement Clinker From Mexico, 55 Fed.Reg. 35,371 (ITC 1990), the United States International Trade Commission (“ITC”) determined that a regional domestic industry in the United States was materially injured by reason of cement imports from Mexico. CEMEX, S.A., a Mexican producer of cement, appeals from the determination, and now moves for judgment on the agency record. ITC’s determination is affirmed.
I
BACKGROUND
The Ad Hoe Committee of AZ-NM-TX-FL Producers of Gray Portland Cement (“Ad Hoc Committee”) represents certain cement producers with production…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Atlantic Sugar, Ltd. v. The United States and Amstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Ceramica Regiomontanam, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- The Ad Hoc Committee of Az-Nm-Tx-Fl Producers of Gray Portland Cement v. The United States, Cemex S.A., and Apasco, S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Borden, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Federal-Mogul Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
- BIC Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Sigma Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.