Legal Opinion

Montana Ore Purchasing Co. v. Butte & Boston Consolidated Mining Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1901No. 1,318PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; John- Lindsay, Judge. Action by tlie Montana Ore Purchasing Company against the Bntte & Boston Consolidated Mining Company and others. From an order refusing- a preliminary injunction, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brantly

This action was instituted by the plaintiff for the purpose . of obtaining a perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from obstructing a certain way or road used by plaintiff in hauling lumber and other supplies to its mines and in conveying the ores extracted therefrom to its smelter. The smelter is situated near Meaderville, in Silver Bow coxxnty, northeast of Bxxtte. The pxxblic highway leading from Bxxtte to Meaderville runs first east from Bxxtte, and then north, passing immediately to the xxrest of the smelter. A short distance to the soxxth of the smelter the road in controversy…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Merchants' National Bank v. GreenhoodMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. State v. AuchardMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Guiterman v. WishonMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Parrot Silver & Copper Co. v. HeinzeMontana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Sherman v. NasonMontana Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Finlen v. HeinzeMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Lovelace v. HightowerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Pope v. AlexanderMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. State ex rel. Dansie v. NolanMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Violet v. MartinMontana Supreme Court · 1922

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API