Legal Opinion

Parrot Silver & Copper Co. v. Heinze

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1901No. 1,601PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Silver Boiv County; William Clancy, Judge. Suit by the Parrot Silver & Copper Company against A. P. IIeinze and others to determine the title to ore bodies beneath the surface of plaintiff’s mining claim, and for injunction pendente lite to restrain defendants from removing ore therefrom. From an order granting the injunction, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brantly

*141Action in the nature of ejectment to determine the title to certain openings and ore bodies beneath the surface of the Adventure mining’ claim, situate in Silver Bow county. The plaintiff, upon tiling the complaint, asked for an injunction pendente lite to restrain defendants from removing the ores, in question. From an order granting the injunction the defendants have appealed.

The principal question presented by the appeal can best be understood by reference to the subjoined diagram, which illustrates the contentions of the parties:

The plaintiff is the owner of the Adventure of the claim,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Del Monte Mining & Milling Co. v. Last Chance Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Mining Co. v. TarbetSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Iron Silver Mining Co. v. Elgin Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. King v. Amy & Silversmith Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Argentine Mining Co. v. Terrible Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Anaconda Copper Mining Co. v. District Court of the Second Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Atkinson v. Roosevelt CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Montana Ore Purchasing Co. v. Butte & Boston Consolidated Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1901
  4. St. Louis Mining & Milling Co. v. Montana Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Silver Surprize, Inc. v. Sunshine Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API