Guiterman v. Wishon
Montana Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; John Lindsay, Judge. Action by A. Guiterman and others against W. S. Wishon on an account. Judgment for plaintiffs on demurrer to the answer, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.
— Action by plaintiffs (respondents), who allege that they are co-partners, against defendant (appellant), for §398.89, balance due upon an account for goods sold during *459the year 1893. The total value of goods so sold is alleged to be §429.39, of Avhich sum appellant is alleged to have paid §30.50 on March 17, 1894. Complaint Avas filed Nov. 21, 1896. Defendant, in the following language, denied payment of §30.50 on March 17, 1894: “Denies that on the 17th day of March, 1894, or at any other time or times since the said 28th day of July, 1893, the defendant paid to the plaintiffs the sum of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Price v. HopkinMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Carlock v. CagnacciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Pendleton v. ClineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Axe v. TolbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Morrison v. Farmers & Traders' State BankMontana Supreme Court · 1924
- Bleecker v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- State v. City of AberdeenWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Cosgriffe v. CosgriffeMontana Supreme Court · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.