Legal Opinion

Sherman v. Nason

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1901No. 1,320PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Madison County; M. II. Par-leer, Judge. Action by W. P. Sbernian against Richard Nason. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pigott

This action was brought to recover judgment for $262 (including interest) upon an open account for goods, wares and merchandise alleged to have been furnished by the assignor of the plaintiff to the defendant on the 31st day of December, *2841892. We notice that the complaint, specifies, “Mass at church, $20,” as an item of the “goods and merchandise” which the 1 plaintiff’s assignor “furnished to defendant at his special instance and request;” but as the defendant is seemingly content with the description, and has not questioned its legal accuracy, we make no comment thereon, and do not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Westheimer v. GoodkindMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Nolan v. Montana Central Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beach v. Spokane Ranch & Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Montana Ore Purchasing Co. v. Butte & Boston Consolidated Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Reid v. Solar CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1946
  4. Wilson v. PickeringMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Cranston v. New Process Fibre Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API