Partridge v. Boston & M. R.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District-of Massachusetts. Actions at law by Warren G. Partridge, administrator, and by Alice B. Minard, against the Boston & Maine Railroad Company. Judgment for defendant in the first action, and plaintiff brings error. Affirmed. Judgment for plaintiff in the second action, and both parties bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.
Three writs of error are- here involved, and are grouped together by us as a matter of convenience for the reason that, in this case, the injury happened through a collision at a railroad crossing while the intestate, Phillips Payne Partridge, represented by the administrator of his estaté, the plaintiff in error in No. 875, and Miss Alice B. Minard, the plaintiff in error in No. 882, and the defendant in error in No. 883, were riding together over the crossing, the injury occurring to both simultaneously, resulting in the death of Phillips Payne Partridge after a space…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Little v. HackettSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Shultz v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Davis v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- State v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888
- Pyle v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Southern Pac. Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918
- Rebillard v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. S. M. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
- Dawson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- Cromwell v. SlaneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933
- American Sugar Refining Co. v. NassifCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.