Legal Opinion

Dawson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 18, 1926No. 4627PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCAMANT, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The defendants testified that on the 24th of December, 1918, they entered into a written contract of marriage in the presence of Wm. L. McConnell, a notary or justice of the peace at Idaho Palls; also that since that date they have held themselves out as man and wife. Based upon this testimony, defendants requested the trial court to give the following instruction:

“That if you find from the evidence that the defendants were man and wife during the period covered by the first count or charge in the indictment, and the evidence herein, you should find both…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Meister v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Huff v. HuffIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Hickman v. LayneNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. DegeSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Sanford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  3. United States v. AnthonyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Gardner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  5. Massenberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API