Davis v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Frror to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas.
1Opinion of the Court
PHILIPS, District Judge.
The plaintiff in error (hereinafter designated the plaintiff) sued the defendant in error (hereinafter desig*11nated the defendant) to recover damages for personal injuries. As the trial court at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence directed a verdict for the defendant, a review of the case made is rendered necessary.
The plaintiff, a man of middle age, and one Pfeutze, resided in the town of .Manhattan, Kan., a few -miles distant from the crossing of the public highway over the track of the defendant railroad company where the accident in question occurred. On the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Little v. HackettSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad v. HogelandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
- Henze v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1880
- Bresee v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Brommer v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
- Bradley v. Missouri Pac. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
- Parmenter v. McDougallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- United Railways & Electric Co. v. CrainCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
- Atchison, T. &. S. F. Ry. Co. v. McNultyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.