Legal Opinion
Shah v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 5, 2009No. AC 26998PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The defendant administrator of the Unemployment Compensation Act appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court sustaining the plaintiffs 1 appeal from the determination by the employment security board of review (board) denying the plaintiff, Crystal M. Shah, unemployment compensation benefits. On appeal, the defendant 2 claims that the court improperly concluded that the plaintiff complied with the requirements of Practice Book § 22-4. 3 We agree and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the Superior Court.
On January 5, 2004, the plaintiff resigned from her employment as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Calnan v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- JSF Promotions, Inc. v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Mercer v. CosleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Travelers Property & Casualty Co. v. ChristieConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Chavez v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rafalko v. University of New HavenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- TD Banknorth, N.A. v. White Water Mountain Resorts of Connecticut, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Belica v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Tosado v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Addona v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.