Legal Opinion

Addona v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 25, 2010No. AC 30721PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DiPENTIMA, J.

The defendant administrator of the Unemployment Compensation Act 1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court reversing the decision of the employment security board of review (board). The board had affirmed the decision of an appeals referee of the employment security appeals division who had found that the plaintiff, Frank Addona, was not entitled to unemployment compensation benefits. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly determined that the plaintiff had been denied due process of law. We agree and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the trial…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Robinson v. Unemployment Security Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. Burnham v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. Mattatuck Museum-Mattatuck Historical Society v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marquand v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. Chicatell v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  3. Family Garage, Inc. v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  4. Seward v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API