Legal Opinion
Oppenheimer v. Deutchman
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 30, 1953No. Civ. 19576PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment pursuant to verdict in an action brought by him for alleged assault and battery. The first amended complaint sought to include two other defendants in addition to Julius Deutchman. They were excluded by order of the trial court which was affirmed on a prior appeal of this case (104 Cal.App.2d 165 [230 P.2d 873]) leaving the defendant above named as the only person against whom relief was sought at the trial.
The question for determination by the jury was whether defendant on a date and at a place specified in the amended complaint “violently…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jones v. Tierney-SinclairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Schuh v. R. H. Herron Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Gajanich v. GregoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Williams v. SeiglitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Niegel v. Georgetown Divide Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Sloan v. StearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- South Santa Clara Valley Water Conservation District v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Brown v. AffonsoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Oppenheimer v. DeutchmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.