Legal Opinion

Oppenheimer v. Deutchman

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 20, 1958No. Civ. No. 19576Published

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

On July 30, 1953, this court in Oppenheimer v. Deutchman, 119 Cal.App.2d 450 [259 P.2d 457], affirmed a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County based upon the verdict of a jury finding that plaintiff, John G. Oppenheimer, was not entitled to damages for an alleged assault. As stated by the court in that opinion, “plaintiff was the only witness who testified concerning the alleged wrongful acts of defendant Julius Deutchman,” alleged to have been committed when plaintiff attempted to serve papers on the defendant. Prior to trial both plaintiff and defendant appeared at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Southwestern Investment Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Thompson v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Oppenheimer v. DeutchmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Avakian v. DusenberryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Tonnesen v. TonnesenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API