Schuh v. R. H. Herron Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Gray, Barker & Bowen, and William A. Bowen, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
In an action for personal injuries, the plaintiff recovered judgment against the defendant for damages. The defendant appeals from the' judgment and from an order denying its motion for a new trial, the latter having been taken before the law abolishing such appeals was enacted.
The defendant was carrying on a machine-shop. It had therein a lathe, built on a steel table and fastened to a horizontal shaft turned by a belt from a counter-shaft above. For the purpose of changing the speed of the lathe the shaft and counter-shaft are each fitted with what are called “cones.” A cone is a succession…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Beeson v. Green Mountain Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
- Crabbe v. Mammoth Channel Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Mecham v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Johnson v. PowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Perry v. Angelus Hospital AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Meyer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Pope v. HalpernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- W. States Gas & Elec. Co. v. Bayside Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Hoffman v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Gajanich v. GregoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.