Legal Opinion

Niegel v. Georgetown Divide Water Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 7, 1947No. Civ. 7331PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

Plaintiffs by their complaint sought injunctive relief and damages against defendant for the alleged negligent maintenance of a ditch, a portion of which crosses plaintiffs’ land. Defendant, a public utility, supplying water for public purposes in the vicinity of Georgetown, El Dorado County, answered, admitting the ownership and maintenance of said ditch under rights acquired by its predecessors in interest between the years 1850 and 1870, prior to the time of issuance of the patent from the United States for the land now occupied by plaintiffs, and denied any negligence whatever in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Peck v. NoeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. L. Mini Estate Co. v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kleinclaus v. Marin Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Oppenheimer v. DeutchmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Nelson v. ColbeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Helmick v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API