Legal Opinion
Kuser v. Orkis
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 1, 1975PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, C. J.
The plaintiff, Blanche Kuser, began this action in 1963 pursuant to the provisions of what was then chapter 911 of the General Statutes, alleging that the defendant, Walter Orkis, was the father of her child born May 20, 1962, which child, when born, was a bastard, and that she was again pregnant with child begotten by the defendant, which child when born would also be a bastard. The plaintiff sought the arrest of the defendant and other relief as provided by statute. Pursuant to § 52-435, a provision of chapter 911, a warrant was issued by the plaintiff’s attorney as a commissioner of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- McAdams v. BarbieriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Lehon v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Waldron v. RaccioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Brecciaroli v. Commissioner of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Johnson v. FlammiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Maloney v. PacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- State v. LongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Board of Pardons v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Robertson v. ApuzzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.