Legal Opinion
Gruber v. Mobil Oil Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided August 19, 1983No. 83-CV-1155PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
PHILIP PRATT, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings his claim pursuant to the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act (PMPA), 15 U.S.C. § 2801 et seq., alleging that Mobil Oil Corporation illegally failed to renew its franchise and lease agreements with plaintiff. The defendant Mobil Oil maintains that the PMPA permits the non-renewal since plaintiff continually refused to comply with the hours of operation in the lease agreement, which defendant asserts is a reasonable and material provision justifying nonrenewal. 15 U.S.C. § 2802(b)(2)(A) & (B). Defendant also…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- William C. Brach, Cross-Appellant v. Amoco Oil Company, a Maryland Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Nazario Castaneda-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Munno v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1980
- Saad v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1978
- Gilderhus v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Byron C. Darling, III v. Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- George C. Doebereiner v. Sohio Oil Company, D/B/A B.P. Oil Company, Gulf Products DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- California Petroleum Distributors Inc. v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- Esquivel v. Exxon Co., USADistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1988
- Marks v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.