Legal Opinion
Weisman v. Darneille
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 19, 1980No. 77 Civ. 2110 (RJW)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
This action seeks damages for the defendants’ alleged violation of the federal securities laws and common-law principles of fraud and fiduciary duty. Proposed Intervenor Michael Caro (“Caro”) has moved, *49pursuant to Rule 24, Fed.R.Civ.P., for leave to intervene as a plaintiff in this action on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated. For the reasons hereinafter stated, Caro’s motion is granted.
Background
Samuel Weisman (“Weisman”) commenced this suit as a class action on May 2, 1977, by filing a complaint that sought damages for the defendants’ alleged…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Jimenez v. WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- United States Postal Service v. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Satterwhite v. City of GreenvilleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Stull v. BayardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Spirt v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- United States v. City Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- In re Discovery Zone Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- United States v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Diduck v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.