United States Postal Service v. Brennan
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
VAN GRAAFEILAND, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York denying a Rule 24 application to intervene. We affirm.
In February 1977, Patricia Brennan and J. Paul Brennan, a young couple in Rochester, New York, undertook the somewhat awesome task of disputing with the United States Postal Service the constitutionality of the Private Express Statutes and applicable Postal Service Regulations. 18 U.S.C. §§ 1693-99, 1724; 39 U.S.C. §§ 601-06; 39 C.F.R. §§ 310, 320. The dispute arose out of the Service’s action seeking…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- United States v. Pitney Bowes, Inc., Edo Corporation Plessey, Inc. Vernitron Corp., Baii Banking Corp., Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Restor-A-Dent Dental Laboratories, Inc. v. Certified Alloy Products, Inc., Unigard Mutual Insurance Company, Intervener-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- German by German v. Federal Home Loan Mortg. Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Mausolf v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Ruiz v. EstelleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.