Legal Opinion

In re Discovery Zone Securities Litigation

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 3, 1998No. 94 C 7089PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CASTILLO, District Judge.

Now approaching its fourth anniversary, this federal securities fraud class action comes before us for decision on a third critical motion.1 Our two earlier opinions granted in part and denied in part the individual defendants’ motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ 1934 Securities Exchange Act claims and certified a modified class of Discovery Zone (“DZ”) common stock purchasers. We must now decide whether, on the eve of settlement and after three years of contentious litigation and the considerable investment of judicial resources, McDonald’s…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United Airlines, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Joseph v. WilesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  2. Manufacturers Consolidation Service, Inc. v. RodellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  3. In Re Enron Corp. SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
  4. Official Committee of Asbestos of G-I Holding, Inc. v. HeymanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  5. In Re Enron Corporation SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API