Legal Opinion
Diduck v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 15, 1993No. 83 Civ. 6346 (CES)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
STEWART, District Judge:
Joseph Hardy and Harvey Sherrod (collectively the Applicants) move to intervene in this action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(d)(2) and 24(a) or (b). Alternatively, they move to be substituted in this action pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 25(a). For the reasons that follow, the motion to intervene is granted.
BACKGROUND
The underlying facts of this case have been set forth in several prior opinions. See, e.g., Diduck v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc., 774 F.Supp. 802 (S.D.N.Y.1991). Familiarity with these opinions is presumed.
The current motion stems from…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Floyd v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. CallahanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Dorsett v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Cobell v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.