Legal Opinion
Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Linsky
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 13, 1993No. 10590PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
The defendants1 appeal from the deficiency judgment rendered against them by the trial court. On appeal, the defendants claim that the trial court improperly used the leased fee value of the prop*14erty for the purposes of the deficiency judgment rather than the fee simple value of the property. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The subject property is a commercially zoned parcel located at 131 Dwight Street in New Haven. In September of 1990, the plaintiff, Connecticut Bank and Trust Company, N.A., filed a writ against the defendants seeking a strict foreclosure of its mortgage on the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Jacobsen v. JacobsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Scherr v. ScherrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- DeMilo v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Emigrant Savings Bank v. EricksonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Plati v. United Parcel ServiceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Gorneault v. GorneaultConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Sinnott v. SinnottConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Westfall v. WestfallConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.