Emigrant Savings Bank v. Erickson
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The defendants, James W. Erickson and Janice A. Erickson, appeal from the trial court’s denial of the motion, filed by the defendant James Erickson, to open the judgment of strict foreclosure. The defendants make several claims that we need not address to resolve this appeal.1
The relevant facts necessary for a proper disposition of this appeal are as follows. In November, 1995, the plaintiff commenced the underlying proceedings to foreclose a mortgage on property owned by the defendants. On February 13, 1996, the trial court, Thim, J., rendered a judgment of strict foreclosure and set…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- DeMilo v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. RiosConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. LinskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Sinnott v. SinnottConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
4Cited by12 opinions
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. AECO Elevator Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Sullivan v. Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Crystal Lake Clean Water Preservation Ass'n v. Town of EllingtonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Tisdale v. Riverside Cemetery Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. MachadoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.