Legal Opinion

O'Buck v. Cottonwood Village Condominium Ass'n

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1988No. S-1786PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

In this case the owners of a condominium unit brought suit against the condominium association challenging a rule banning the mounting of television antennae anywhere on the buildings. After a non-jury trial, the superior court entered judgment in favor of the association.

We hold the rule banning antennae valid and thus affirm.

I

John and Janie O’Buck, plaintiffs and appellants in this case, purchased a unit in the Cottonwood Village Condominiums in June 1981. At that time, the unit was pre-wired for a central television antenna and for Visions, an antenna-based…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Palfy v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Hidden Harbour Estates, Inc. v. NormanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. Tolstrup v. MillerAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Dale v. Greater Anchorage Area BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Norris v. GattsAlaska Supreme Court · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Stadnicky v. Southpark Terrace Homeowner's Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Worthinglen Condominium Unit Owners' Ass'n v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Bennett v. WeimarAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. GARDEN LAKES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. v. MadiganCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  5. Van Biene v. ERA Helicopters, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API