Legal Opinion

Worthinglen Condominium Unit Owners' Ass'n v. Brown

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 1989No. 89AP-254PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryant, J.

Plaintiff-appellant, Worthinglen Condominium Unit Owners’ Association (“Worthinglen”), appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas holding an amendment to the condominium declaration to be unenforceable.

Plaintiff sets forth the following as its sole assignment of error:

“The court erred, as a matter of law, in holding that an amendment to a condominium declaration prohibiting unit owners from leasing their units is unenforceable against owners who acquired condominium units prior to the adoption of that amendment.”

Plaintiff is a condominium unit owners’ association. On…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Hidden Harbour Estates, Inc. v. NormanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. Papalexiou v. Tower West CondominiumNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  4. Seagate Condominium Association, Inc. v. DuffyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  5. Rywalt v. Writer CorporationColorado Court of Appeals · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. R. Douglas Hughes v. New Life Development CorporationTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Armstrong v. Ledges Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  3. Woodside Village Condominium Association, Inc. v. JahrenSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  4. Apple II Condominium Ass'n v. Worth Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  5. Shorewood West Condominium Ass'n v. SadriWashington Supreme Court · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API