Legal Opinion

Slinski v. Bank of America, N.A.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 30, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2011-0720PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge

Sarah Slinski had a contract to buy the condominium in which she lives from Freddie Mae, which acquired the property in a foreclosure sale. She applied to Bank of America for a home mortgage. While her mortgage application was pending, Freddie Mac apparently sold the property to Bank of America. Ms. Slinski and another plaintiff brought suit alleging breach of contract and other theories of recovery. Many — but not all — of their claims will be dismissed.

I. BACKGROUND

Paul and Sarah Slinski allege that, in August 2009, Ms.…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jacobson v. HofgardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  2. Attias v. Carefirst, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  3. Motir Services, Inc. v. EkwunoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  4. U.S. Conference of Mayors v. Great-W. Life & Annuity Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  5. Attias v. Carefirst, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API