Ruble v. Richardson
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, J.
The plaintiff; brought this action against the defendant as executor of the estate of Josephine G. Kitchen, deceased, for the breach of • an alleged contract of the decedent to make provision for plaintiff in her will, in return for personal services rendered. The trial court entered a judgment of nonsuit, and the plaintiff has appealed.
The basis of the action is the presentation by plaintiff and the rejection by defendant of a claim for the reasonable value of the services. The amended complaint is in two counts. The first, in addition to the usual preliminary facts as to the death of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Grant v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Morrison v. LandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Pollitz v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Doolittle v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kitchen v. BallardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- De Mattos v. McGovernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Leoni v. DelanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Hartley v. BohrerIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
- Jones v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.