Legal Opinion

American Feldmuehle Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 14, 1970No. C.D. 4021PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pao, Chief Judge:

The merchandise covered by these protests, consolidated at the trial, consists of triangular insert blanks, and tool tip blanks, made wholly of porcelain, which are processed after importation and used with machinery for cutting metal.

The merchandise was assessed with duty at 21 per centum ad valorem under item 649.45, Tariff Schedules of the United States, which provides for interchangeable tools for hand tools or machine tools suitable for cutting metal. The headnote to schedule 6, subpart 3E, which sub-part includes item 649.45, provides, with certain exceptions not here…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  2. Chas. Kurz Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Landay Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  4. American Express Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. Engis Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Avins Industrial Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
  2. Servco Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  3. Henry A. Wess, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  4. Mitsubishi International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API