Legal Opinion

Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 9, 1969No. C.D. 3896PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bao, Chief Judge:

The merchandise involved in this case consists of place mats imported from Japan and entered at the port of Los Angeles. It was assessed with duty at 42% per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1529 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified. It is claimed that the merchandise is properly dutiable under paragraph 31(b) of said tariff act, as modified, at 25 or 25% per centum ad valorem, as articles in chief value of cellophane, or under paragraph 1558, as modified, at 10 per centum ad valorem, as unenumerated manufactured articles.

The official papers do not disclose under which…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. John S. Connor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. Gillette Safety Razor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  3. Swiss Manufactures Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  4. United States v. BernardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  5. Chas. Kurz Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Plastic Service Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. United States v. Miracle Exclusives, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  3. B. Shackman & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  4. Domestic Marble & Stone Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  5. J. C. Penney Purchasing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API