Lion Coal Co. v. Contas

Riner, Justice.

Appellant has presented its “petitions and motions” supported by briefs to reinstate these causes, which were dismissed (289 Pac. 368) Lion Coal Co. v. Contas, because this court held, following its previous decisions, that it had no jurisdiction to entertain an appeal in a Workmen’s Compensation case where the record was not filed here as required by the imperative language of Section 4328, W. C. S. 1920, as amended by Laws 1925, Ch. 124, Sec. 2. We regard these petitions and motions as coming within the provisions of our rule twenty-three.

It is insisted by appellant that…