Legal Opinion

Schaefer-LaRose v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 8, 2012No. 10-3855, 11-1980, 11-2131PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.

These two cases, which we have consolidated for opinion, involve the application of the outside sales and administrative exemptions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA” or the “Act”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-19, to pharmaceutical sales representatives employed by Eli Lilly & Co. (“Lilly”) and Abbott Laboratories, Inc. (“Abbott”). The plaintiffs in each case claim that, during their tenure as sales representatives with these pharmaceutical companies, they were misclassified as exempt employees and denied overtime pay, in violation of the statute. 1 The employers contend that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. v. CokeSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Susie Bigger v. Facebook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  2. Ramos v. Baldor Specialty Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  3. Nicks v. Koch Meat Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
  4. Beauford Ex Rel. Cox v. ActionLink, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  5. Deschepper v. Midwest Wine & Spirits, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API