Legal Opinion
Haywood v. North American Van Lines, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 31, 1997No. 96-3114PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
Dorothy Haywood filed a complaint in the district court alleging that North American Van Lines, her employer, had violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq., by failing to pay her overtime compensation. North American filed an answer in which it contended that it was not obligated to pay Ms. Haywood any overtime because she was a salaried exempt employee. North American subsequently filed a motion for summary judgment, which the district court granted. For the reasons set forth in the following opinion, we affirm the judgment of the district…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Batterton v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- George A. Darnell v. Target StoresCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Anthony Hill v. Daniel M. TangherliniCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Abuzaffer Basith v. Cook CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Gabe Keri v. Board of Trustees of Purdue UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Jackson v. Bloomberg, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Terry Logan v. Caterpillar, Inc., Rita Knapp, David Wendling, Eric Rueschhoff, and Wendy Watta F/k/a VosbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.