Legal Opinion

Amendola v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 4, 2008No. 07 Civ. 6088(DLC)PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

DENISE COTE, District Judge.

This litigation raises the question of whether pharmaceutical representatives (“PRs”) employed by a major pharmaceutical company are properly classified as exempt from the overtime compensation rules prescribed by the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (“FLSA”). Plaintiff Beth Amendola (“Am-endola”) has moved for discovery of the names and addresses of the defendant’s PRs, authorization for notice of this collective action to be sent to those potential plaintiffs, and equitable tolling of any claims they may file. Finding among other…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Chuan Wang v. PalmisanoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  2. Hamadou v. Hess Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  3. Copantitla v. Fiskardo Estiatorio, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  4. Benavides v. Serenity Spa NY Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  5. Cunningham v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API