Legal Opinion
Icicle Seafoods, Inc. v. Worthington
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 21, 1986No. 85-195PublishedCited by 463 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnquist
Respondents sued their employer, petitioner Icicle Sea-foods, Inc., to recover overtime benefits to which they thought they were entitled under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U. S. C. § 207(a)(1). After a 2-day trial, the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington held that respondents were excluded from the overtime benefits of the FLSA by 29 U. S. C. § 213(b)(6), which excludes “any employee employed as a seaman.” Reviewing this issue under a “de novo” standard of review, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the judgment of the District…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Rutherford Food Corp. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Levinson v. Spector Motor ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by463 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Kungys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Barbara Allen v. R & H Oil & Gas Company, Farrar Oilfield Service and Equipment Co., and Tri-State Oil Services, Inc., Tri-State Oil Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Amadeo v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
458 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.