Legal Opinion

Mannion v. Marsh

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1917No. Civil No. 1539Published

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Santa Cruz. Prank Baxter, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

Prior to September 26, 1914, the southeast-quarter of the southeast quarter and lot 6, section 17, and lots 1 and 2, section 20, township 20 south, range 14 east, Santa Cruz county, Arizona, was unappropriated public lands. On that day appellant entered it as a homestead by paying the legal filing fees to the proper land office and receiving therefrom “Notice of Allowance,” which recited that application had been allowed subject to further compliance with law and regulations applicable thereto. At the time the land was unoccupied and unimproved, except 8.97 acres along its northern boundary.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Whittaker v. PendolaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Haven v. HawsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Gragg v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Wormouth v. GardnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Balsz v. LiebenowArizona Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API