Legal Opinion

Balsz v. Liebenow

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1894No. Civil No. 382PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Maricopa. H. C. Gooding, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

Appellee brought suit in the district court, Maricopa County, against appellants, to recover the possession of the northeast quarter of section 12, in township 1 north, range 3 east, Gila and Salt River base and meridian. There was a jury trial, and verdict for appellee. From the judgment and order overruling their motion for a new trial, appellants have taken this appeal

The facts, as they appear from the transcript, are substantially these: On the twenty-ninth day of August, 1881, one Vail made a timber-culture entry for the land in question. On February 2, 1885, Vail conveyed said land by…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Atherton v. FowlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Hemphill v. DaviesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mannion v. MarshArizona Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API