Legal Opinion

Gragg v. Cooper

California Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1907No. L.A. No. 1612PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. W. S. Day, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendants in an action by plaintiff to recover possession of a tract of land.

The land in question was, on and prior to February 24,1903, a part of the public lands of the United States. At that time, and for a long time prior thereto, the defendants and their predecessor in interest had been in possession of the land, had inclosed it by a substantial fence, and were, and had been, using it for agricultural purposes, claiming title thereto. On that day the plaintiff, who was a person qualified under the laws of the United States to take up…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. McCabeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Whittaker v. PendolaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. McBrown v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Davis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Haven v. HawsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. CampodonicoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  2. Lytle v. DevlinNevada Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Mannion v. MarshArizona Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Tonopah & Goldfield Railroad v. FellanbaumNevada Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API