Legal Opinion

Wormouth v. Gardner

California Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1894No. 15645PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Marin County granting a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.

Action to recover possession of a tract of land containing forty-six and twenty-six hundredths acres. The case was tried by the court without a jury, and the issues of fact being found in favor of the defendants, judgment was thereupon rendered against the plaintiff. Subsequently, the plaintiff's motion for a new *150trial was granted, and from this order the defendants have appealed.

1. The motion for a new trial was properly granted. The plaintiff’s right to the possession of the land in controversy was based upon a United States homestead entry, made May 20, 1881, and a receipt given by the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Martin v. BartmusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Wormouth v. GardnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Mannion v. MarshArizona Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API