Legal Opinion
Second National Bank of New Haven v. Dyer
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 7, 1936PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The plaintiff brought this action to foreclose a mortgage made by the defendant James A. Dyer to the Thomas F. Clark Company and assigned by that company to it. The Prudential Life Insurance Company was made a defendant as claiming an interest in the mortgaged premises by reason of an assignment of the same mortgage to it by the Clark Company, which was alleged to be subsequent to the assignment to the plaintiff. The Insurance Company, to which we shall hereafter refer as the defendant, filed an answer and cross-complaint. The cross-complaint gave a rather detailed history of the transaction…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Goldberg v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Basak v. DamutzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- City National Bank v. StoeckelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Wiley v. London & Lancashire Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Genovese Drug Stores, Inc. v. Connecticut Packing Company, Inc., and Fotomat CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Family Financial Services, Inc. v. SpencerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. GarofaloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Hulk v. Rosenbaum (In Re Hulk)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.