Legal Opinion

Mesar v. Southern Surety Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1929PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.

Steve Brem, the driver of the automobile, died before this action was instituted, and it was commenced against the administrator of his estate. The appellants contend that the cause of action did not survive the death of Brem. Sec. 331.01 of the Statutes provides:

“In addition to the actions which survive at common law the following shall also survive: Actions for the recovery of personal property or the unlawful withholding or conversion thereof, for the recovery of the possession of real estate and for the unlawful withholding of the possession thereof, for assault and battery, false…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Harrigan v. GilchristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. John V. Farwell Co. v. WolfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Lindemann v. RuskWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Morawetz v. Sun Insurance OfficeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Koehler v. Waukesha Milk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bartholomew v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund & Compcare Health Services InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Juneau County v. Courthouse EmployeesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Kertson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  4. Isaksen v. Chesapeake Instrument Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Hegel v. GeorgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API