Legal Opinion
Kertson v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 8, 1932No. 28,715PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoring, J.
The plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident in Wisconsin due to. the alleged negligence of defendant’s intestate. He brought suit in Minnesota against both the personal representative of the deceased tortfeasor and the company which carried the liability insurance on the deceased’s car. Both defendants demurred on the grounds that the court had no jurisdiction either of the defendants or of the subject matter and that the complaint did not state a cause of action. Both demurrers were sustained, and the plaintiff appealed.
The plaintiff has pleaded the statutes of Wisconsin relative to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Howarth v. LombardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Drewek v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Comstock v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Bergstein v. PopkinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Chubbuck v. HollowaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Grant v. McAuliffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Myers v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Hoosier Cas. Co. of Indianapolis, Ind. v. FoxDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1952
- Marchlik v. Coronet InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
- Joe W. Collins, as Committee for Travious Riddle Collins, Incompetent v. American Automobile Insurance Company of St. Louis, MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.