Legal Opinion

United States v. Canex International Lumber Sales Ltd.

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 1, 2008No. 1:97-s-01203Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RESTANI, Chief Judge:

Between April 12, 2000, and October 23, 2000, defendant Canex International Lumber Sales Ltd. (“Canex”) entered 151 entries of angle-cut lumber under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) heading 4418. (Compl. ¶¶ 11, 23.) After entry, U.S. Customs and Border Patrol (“Customs”) classified the merchandise under HTSUS heading 4407. (Id. at ¶¶ 13, 25.) Because Canex did not provide proof of the export permits required for imports under heading 4407, Customs issued notice assessing liquidated damages against Canex. (Id. at ¶¶ 17, 29.) Canex protested…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. The United States of America v. The Cocoa Berkau, Incorporated, and Washington International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Ataka America, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 1993
  4. Corus Staal BV v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API