Legal Opinion

United States of America, State of California, Intervenor v. Raphyal Crawford, AKA Aarmyl Crawford

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 21, 2004No. 01-50633PublishedCited by 202 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge GRABER; Concurrence by Judge O’SCANNLAIN; Concurrence by Judge TROTT; Concurrence by Judge KLEINFELD; Dissent by Judge W. FLETCHER

GRABER, Circuit Judge:

Defendant Raphyal Crawford appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress a statement that he made to law enforcement officers, arguing that the statement was taken in violation of his Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures and in violation of his entitlement to Miranda warnings under the Fifth Amendment. Defendant also appeals the district court’s imposition of a two-level…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by202 opinions

  1. Samson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. United States v. Thomas Cameron KincadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. Antonio Rodriguez-Preciado, AKA Tony Rodriguez-PreciadoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. CraigheadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. StatenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

197 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API