Legal Opinion
United States v. Staten
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 7, 2006No. 05-30055PublishedCited by 115 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed June 7, 2006, slip. op. 6211, and published at 450 F.3d 384 (9th Cir.2006) is hereby amended as follows:
1. At slip op. 6227 [450 F.3d at 392], delete from “There is an additional reason .... ” through to the end of Part III of the opinion.
2. Replace deleted text with Section C in the attached amended opinion, starting with the language “There is an additional reason .... ” through to “.... as determined in accord with existing case law, the enhancement must be supported by facts established by clear and convincing evidence.”
No petitions for rehearing will be entertained.
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- United States v. Francisco Gasca-RuizCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. TreadwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. LangfordCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Anthony GadsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. GrubbsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.