Legal Opinion
Armed Forces Insurance Exchange v. Transamerica Insurance Co.
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
Decided September 16, 1998No. 21183PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ACOBA, Judge.
We hold herein that the exclusion for activities arising out of business pursuits as applied to personal liability coverage in the homeowner’s insurance policy issued by Defendant-Appellee TIG 1 (TIG) refers to “activities which are conducted on a regular basis for the purposes of earning income, profit, and as a means of livelihood.” 9 L. Russ & T. Segalla, Couch on Insurance, § 128:13, at 17-18 (3d ed.1997) (footnote omitted) [hereinafter Couch], We conclude that the question of whether “a given activity constitutes a business pursuit ... is determined by the facts of the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- First Ins. Co. of Hawaii v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1983
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. SippleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Hawaiian Holiday MacAdamia Nut Co. v. Industrial Indemnity Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- Martinelli v. Security Insurance Co. of New HavenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Commerce & Industry Insurance v. Bank of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. v. PasiakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Luneau v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Zimmerman v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. WillisonDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
- Allstate Insurance v. HuiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.