Legal Opinion
Allstate Insurance v. Hui
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided July 6, 1999No. Civ. 98-507 ACKPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KAY, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
On June 15, 1998, Plaintiff Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate”) filed a complaint for declaratory relief seeking a declaration that it was not required to defend or indemnify one of its insureds, Defendant Kane K. Hui (“Defendant”), 1 with respect to any claims asserted in two separate lawsuits in California. 2 Allstate has insured Defendant under Allstate Deluxe Homeowner’s Policy No. 017-829-969 (the “policy”), which provides family liability coverage against liabilities resulting from “bodily injury or…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- British Airways Board, 1 v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- CIM Ins. Corp. v. MasamitsuDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1999
- CIM Ins. Corp. v. Midpac Auto Center, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2000
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. WillisonDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
- Allstate Insurance Company v. RosfeldDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2022