Legal Opinion
Hawaiian Holiday MacAdamia Nut Co. v. Industrial Indemnity Co.
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided April 21, 1994No. 16759PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NAKAYAMA, Justice.
Defendants-appellants Industrial Indemnity Company and Industrial Insurance Company of Hawaii, Ltd. (collectively Industrial) appeal orders granting plaintiffs-appellees Hawaiian Holiday Macadamia Nut Company, Inc., (Nut Company) Paul DeDomenico, Anita DeDomenico and Roderick J. Saunder’s (collectively Hawaiian Holiday) motion for summary judgment and denying Industrial’s cross motion for summary judgment.
The trial court determined that Industrial had a duty to defend Hawaiian Holiday because the complaint which gave rise to the action alleged claims of property damage.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- First Ins. Co. of Hawaii v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1983
- AIG Hawaii Insurance v. Estate of CaraangHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
- Commerce & Industry Insurance v. Bank of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
- Kaneohe Bay Cruises, Inc. v. HirataHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. MagoonHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Sentinel Insurance Co. v. First Insurance Co. of Hawai'i, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- Dairy Road Partners v. Island Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- The Burlington Insurance Company v. Oceanic Design & Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Zanakis-Pico v. Cutter Dodge, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2002
- Pancakes of Hawaii, Inc. v. Pomare Properties Corp.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.