Legal Opinion

State v. Graham

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 31, 1984No. 10-83-06170; CA A32307PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*591YOUNG, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for attempted rape in the first degree. ORS 163.375(1)(a); ORS 161.405. He argues that the trial court erred in admitting character evidence and in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal. ORS 136.445.1 We determine that the trial court erred when it denied the motion for judgment of acquittal and reverse.

In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence after a verdict of guilty we resolve any conflicts in the evidence in favor of the state and give the state the benefit of all inferences that can properly be drawn from the evidence. State v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. KrummacherOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State v. McJunkinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. Montana Power Co. v. Department of Public Service RegulationMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. State v. ShippCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. State v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API