Legal Opinion
State v. Tidyman
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 9, 1981No. 79-11-33971, CA 17557; 79-11-33974, CA 17558PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
Defendant Tidyman appeals from .a judgment of conviction for promoting sexual conduct in a live public show in violation of ORS 167.062. The appeal of defendant Art Theatre Guild, Inc., was dismissed. We affirm. 1
I
MOTION TO SUPPRESS ITEMS SEIZED UNDER SEARCH WARRANTS
Police began an undercover investigation of the Star, Chelsea and Tom Kat theatres in downtown Portland, in November, 1978. In August, 1979, warrants were issued to search all three theatres. Defendant contends that the evidence acquired as a result of the execution of the three warrants should have been suppressed, because: (1)…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. HouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. LopezUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. Arriaga-MendozaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. ThibodeauxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. GlosterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.