Legal Opinion
Strausbaugh v. Ohio Department of Transportation
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 5, 2002No. 02AP-03 (REGULAR CALENDAR)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Harsha, Judge.
{¶ 1} Appellant, Beemon Strausbaugh, appeals from the judgment of the Ohio Court of Claims in favor of appellee, the Ohio Department of Transportation (“ODOT”) following a bench trial on his complaint, which asserts causes of action for sexual harassment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent supervision and tortious violation of public policy. 1
{¶ 2} During the summer of 1999, Strausbaugh worked at ODOT as a Highway Maintenance Worker 2, assigned to the Ross County maintenance facility. Paul Corcoran was his direct supervisor. Corcoran and Strausbaugh had…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Greeley v. Miami Valley Maintenance Contractors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- Paugh v. HanksOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Collins v. RizkanaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gary Kusens, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Pascal Company, Inc., Defendants-Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Beckloff v. Amcor Rigid Plastics USA, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Woods v. Miamisburg City SchoolsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
- Walker v. Firelands Community HospitalOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Winkle v. Zettler Funeral Homes, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.