Legal Opinion

Gary Kusens, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Pascal Company, Inc., Defendants-Appellees/cross-Appellants

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 9, 2006No. 04-3570, 04-3682PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROSEN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Gary Kusens appeals from the District Court’s entry of judgment as a matter of law in favor of the Defendants in this diversity action stemming from the termination of Plaintiffs employment. After a full trial on the merits, the District Court granted the defendants’ motion for judgment as a matter of law on Kusens’ statutory age discrimination and retaliation claims, but denied the motion with respect to Plaintiffs Ohio public policy claim. The public policy claim was sent to the jury, which returned a verdict in favor of Kusens.…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Greeley v. Miami Valley Maintenance Contractors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Linda Holmes v. City of Massillon, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Betts v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. Patricia Burlin Tuttle, Plaintiff-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Ford v. County of Grand TraverseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. Carrie Braun v. Ultimate JetchartersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  5. Tina Wallace v. FedEx CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API